[ad_1]
As Kurt Zuma’s proposed move to West Ham United progresses, attention will inevitably turn to Chelsea’s impressive loan army model.
This season, the Blues have loaned out several players, including the likes of Michie Batshuayi, Kenedy and Emerson, to add to the 30+ who ran the 2020-21 campaign away from Stamford Bridge. Meanwhile, since moving to London in 2014, Zuma has spent time on loan in Saint-Etienne, Stoke City and Everton, demonstrating what he’s capable of at various stages of the game.
These loans are often not just a means to an end, as millions are recovered in player transfer fees that were surplus to claims in West London. Indeed, in the past decade alone, the club has earned eight-figure royalties for seven men who took advantage of multiple credit periods before leaving, and hefty sums for countless others, such as Alvaro Morata, Juan Cuadrado and Kevin De Bruyne, who only had one spell before leaving. on loan.
That’s what happened to that big seven. From Chelsea’s point of view, not everything is perfect, but it seems that the car is working well (all camps through Transfermarkt).
1. Tammy Abraham – Moved to AS Roma (£ 36m).
Abraham is arguably a model loan success story, or at least he was until last season.
Two attractive second-tier loans on either side of a challenging top-flight Swansea forward as the striker returned from Aston Villa to become Chelsea’s top player for the 2019-20 season. Things did not go well under Thomas Tuchel, but the decent transfer fees – with the option to buy back if necessary – are still a big bonus for the local talent, who has grown into an England player during his time at the club.
Did Chelsea have the right to sell? Given that there is a ransom clause … yes.
2. Romelu Lukaku – Moved to Everton (£ 31.82m).
On the one hand, selling Lukaku and then buying it back significantly more years later does not look good. On the other hand, giving up a minor player and signing Diego Costa is not much and an immediate victory in the league in the same season looks good.
Lukaku excelled on loan at West Brom, Albion and Everton and has already started his second spell well at Chelsea, but it remains a good price for a man who didn’t look like he had a clear path to the first team. …
Did Chelsea have the right to sell? In general, yes.
3. Fikayo Tomori – Moved to Milan (£ 26.28m).
And here’s how to score your first goal for Chelsea! ☄ Bow down, @fikayotomori_! 👏 pic.twitter.com/JE6ox71sXoSeptember 14, 2019
Tomori’s departure has not been well received by Chelsea fans, in part due to his impressive form in Italy, but his fee is still over £ 1million per Premier League appearance.
Milan was his fourth loan move after three in the league, but fans’ fears are based more on the fact that he could to do, not what he has already achieved. Well, and the fact that he’s been in the club since elementary school.
At least they will always have this target against the Wolves to remember it.
Did Chelsea have the right to sell? Perhaps it is too early to say.
4. Nathan Ake – Moved to Bournemouth (£ 20.52 million).
After Ake got his first opportunity as a teenager at Chelsea, the club sent him on loan in the hopes that it could turn him into a man ready to start playing in the Premier League.
They did it, but the starting place will be a Bournemouth player after Cherry made the Blues an offer that would have been difficult. However, given the Dutchman’s struggles to gain a foothold at Manchester City, one might suspect that he is not considered “the one who fled” in the same manner as his current colleague Kevin De Bruyne.
Did Chelsea have the right to sell? Yes.
5. Mohamed Salah – move to Roma (£ 13.5m)
Salah, like Lukaku, was stripped of demands when he left for rent and then permanently, in his case with Roma in 2016 after spells with Giallorossi and Fiorentina.
The loss of a player who was unable to make his way to the team that won the title was not considered a big loss at the time, but this move helped the Egyptian develop in a way that he might not have coped if he stayed in London and his form was at his best. … In retrospect, Liverpool looks much worse.
Did Chelsea have the right to sell? No.
6. Mario Pashalich – Moved to Atalanta (£ 13.05m).
While the other players on this list have at least ended up in Chelsea’s first team, Pashalich is a purely army type who has never played for the Blues in a single minute of competition since coming from a teenager. “Hajduk Split”. Atalanta represented his fifth other rental location, but for the Croat in Bergamo, things really worked out – he will reach the Champions League quarter-finals in 2020 – and the fee would be a good deal for buying and selling clubs.
Did Chelsea have the right to sell? Yes.
7. Ryan Bertrand – Moved to Southampton (£ 11.97m).
Bertrand’s surprise appearance in the 2012 Champions League final came in the midst of nine different loan periods at seven different clubs, but he made an impression on St Mary’s (and Villa Park in the previous season) enough to mark himself as a reliable and promising player. after moving to permanent residence in 2015.
More than 200 league appearances later, the Saints have clearly paid off before watching the left-back leave for Leicester City this summer, while Chelsea once again got some good money for someone unlikely to be for them. a regular player in the starting lineup.
Did Chelsea have the right to sell? Yes.
Sign up for FourFourTwo today! Ensure the best football stories and interviews are on your doorstep every month.
READ NOW
LIST From Non-League Player to Premier League Star – 10 Greatest Tales
FREE FLOPS 12 awful free transfers that didn’t match their invoices
[ad_2]
Source link
